skip to main | skip to sidebar

HR Tests - Recruitment, assessment, and personnel selection

The science and practice of matching employer needs with individual talent.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

March '09 Journal of Applied Psychology


The March 2009 issue of J.A.P. is out with a lot of great content; for example:

To maximize diversity and validity, try recruiting on cognitive ability and selecting on conscientiousness

In a multistage assessment scenario (which exists for practically every hire), there are several options for maximizing diversity and validity

What determines the success of word of mouth recruitment strategies? Turns out, several things...
(read the draft version here and see Van Hoye's IPAC presentation here)

Interested in improving your T&Es? Check out what this study has to say about self and supervisory agreement of performance ratings.

More clues about what GMA is all about

How P-E fit is related to performance dimensions such as OCB

The importance of job offer negotiation: Subjective value predicts long-term employee outcomes

Posted by BryanB at 3/17/2009

Labels: Adverse impact, Cognitive ability, EEO, P-O fit, Personality testing, Recruiting, Research, T and E, Validity

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

HCI 50 Best Blogs - HR 2011

Recent Comments

Get posts via e-mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Feed for posts

Feed for comments


My shared items

Feed for shared items

Subscribe in a reader

Get shared items via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Terms of service

While I do not have a duty to modify or withdraw posts/comments, I may do so if I choose.
FeedBurner privacy statement

Search this blog

Search Relevant Sites

Labels

  • Adverse impact (39)
  • Advertising (25)
  • Affirmative action (7)
  • Age differences (10)
  • applicant reactions (1)
  • Appraisal (1)
  • Articles (58)
  • Assessment centers (23)
  • ATS (12)
  • Attraction (4)
  • Background checks (14)
  • Benchmarks (1)
  • Best practices (142)
  • Biodata (10)
  • Blogs (16)
  • Books (11)
  • Branding (8)
  • Careers (1)
  • Cognitive ability (38)
  • Compensation (2)
  • Competencies (7)
  • Computer adaptive testing (1)
  • Conferences (30)
  • Creativity (1)
  • credit scores (1)
  • Criteria (1)
  • CSE (1)
  • Cultural differences (3)
  • Cutoff scores (5)
  • CWB (8)
  • Decision-making (1)
  • Disabilities (5)
  • Discrimination (69)
  • Disparate treament (1)
  • Education (3)
  • EEO (4)
  • Emotional intelligence (1)
  • Engagement (4)
  • Executive selection (1)
  • Experience (2)
  • Faking (8)
  • Firefighters (1)
  • Games (2)
  • Gender differences (11)
  • Guest articles (1)
  • Honesty/Integrity (4)
  • HRM (5)
  • HRO (1)
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifRace differences (1)
  • Humorous (19)
  • IM (2)
  • Innovation (33)
  • Interests (2)
  • Internet-based testing (13)
  • Interviews (40)
  • Job analysis (15)
  • Job search (1)
  • leadership (17)
  • Legal (97)
  • Meta-analysis (25)
  • Metrics (2)
  • Military (1)
  • MQs (1)
  • Multiple-choice (1)
  • OCB (6)
  • OFCCP (2)
  • Online testing (4)
  • Org culture (1)
  • P-O fit (16)
  • Perceptions (14)
  • Performance ratings (1)
  • Personality testing (101)
  • Physical ability testing (4)
  • Police (1)
  • Political skill (1)
  • Practice effects (1)
  • Predictions (1)
  • Presentations (25)
  • Procedural justice (5)
  • Professional orgs (28)
  • Public safety (11)
  • Public sector (1)
  • Q and A (4)
  • Race differences (12)
  • Recruiting (55)
  • Reference checks (13)
  • Research (152)
  • Resumes (3)
  • Retention (14)
  • Retesting (1)
  • RJP (8)
  • Search engines (1)
  • Security (1)
  • Simulation (1)
  • Simulations (7)
  • Situational judgment tehttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifsts (1)
  • Situational judgment tests (21)
  • Social networking (17)
  • Software (3)
  • Statistics (36)
  • Stress (2)
  • Surveys (16)
  • T and E (17)
  • Talent War (9)
  • Teams (7)
  • Technology (22)
  • Tests (13)
  • Training (19)
  • Turnover (4)
  • Utility (8)
  • Validity (24)
  • Video (23)
  • Web tools (99)
  • Wiki (3)
  • Work samples (7)
  • Workforce planning (5)
  • Written m-c (5)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (10)
    • ►  May (2)
      • May mega research update
      • What The Avengers can teach us about high-performa...
    • ►  April (2)
      • A fascinating example of an organization making hi...
      • April research update
    • ►  March (4)
      • Facebook fallout continues
      • Epic fail: Employers continue asking applicants fo...
      • Has your organization given up on rigorous assessm...
      • Credit scores: Useful for selection, but not for t...
    • ►  February (1)
      • February 2012 research update: Facebook; hope; 3-o...
    • ►  January (1)
      • January 2012 research update
  • ►  2011 (40)
    • ►  December (2)
      • Final research update of 2011
      • Forget leadership assessment centers: Use the fat ...
    • ►  November (3)
      • Bad hires in hindsight
      • Research update #583: Impression management and a ...
      • How important is assessment, really?
    • ►  October (1)
      • Advice to bballstud_23@mail.com: Apply using a dif...
    • ►  September (2)
      • Research update + happy anniversary...to me!
      • One last time: It's all subjective
    • ►  August (2)
      • August Research update
      • How can assessment help in a downturn?
    • ►  July (3)
      • July Research Update
      • Is Google+ what we've been waiting for?
      • Should you hire more women for your teams?
    • ►  June (3)
      • New emotional intelligence meta-analysis: Now with...
      • Mega research update
      • Can an applicant be TOO qualified? And...does it ...
    • ►  May (5)
      • Recipe for losing a lawsuit
      • Shameless plug: The 2011 IPAC conference
      • IJSA v.19 #2: Personality, personality, personalit...
      • Hiring HR professionals: What are we thinking?
      • Tech tools: Brainshark and Greenshot
    • ►  April (3)
      • Research update: Political skill, stereotype threa...
      • Are executive recruiters discriminating against no...
      • A little of this, a little of that
    • ►  March (4)
      • Seeing through the candidates' eyes
      • Evidence-based I/O: Where are we? More importantl...
      • Research roundup: Political skill, emotions, and.....
      • Gild.com: What the future looks like
    • ►  February (6)
      • Spring '11 P-Psych: Leadership, interviews, compet...
      • "Grit": An example of will do
      • March IJSA: So much good stuff
      • Research update: From item context to signaling th...
      • We can make assessments "fun"...should we?
      • New blog: Select Perspectives
    • ►  January (6)
      • Job ads: Choose your words wisely
      • Jan TIP gems: HRO, UIT, SIOP, and VII
      • January, 2011 J.A.P.: Interests, trainability test...
      • Supreme Court upholds NASA background checks
      • Why aren't more supervisors held accountable for t...
      • IPAC Call for Proposals Open
  • ►  2010 (58)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2009 (65)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ▼  March (8)
      • March '09 IJSA
      • Biodata in the news
      • What tweeting says about you
      • March '09 Journal of Applied Psychology
      • Recruiting using Web 2.0
      • Feedback can Rypple
      • New newsletter
      • What's in a name?
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2008 (103)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2007 (182)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2006 (109)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (36)

HR Tests Wiki

  • Click here

Jobs from SimplyHired

Loading...

Best...resources...ever

  • O*NET/DOL Guide
  • OPM Hiring Toolkit
  • Dr. Lievens' publications
  • Dr. Morgeson's research
  • Dr. Aguinis' research
  • IPAC Library
  • Schmidt & Hunter, 1998
  • MSPB Studies
  • CA TV&C

Blogs to watch

  • ERE
  • LawMemo Employment Law
  • OFCCP Blogspot
  • Science of Personality
  • HRLitehouse

The big three references

  • The Uniform Guidelines
  • APA Standards
  • SIOP Principles

Personality tests

  • Hogan Personality Inventory
  • 16PF
  • Personal Characteristics Inventory

Cognitive ability tests

  • Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal
  • Wonderlic Personnel Test

About Me

BryanB
View my complete profile
View Bryan Baldwin's profile on LinkedIn

View my page on I-O Practitioners Network

View my page on RecruitingBlogs.com

My presentations & publications

  • Hiring right
  • The future of selection
  • Using the blogosphere to enhance recruitment, assessment, and retention
  • How to hire (VIDEO)
  • Creating defensible selection procedures
  • Moving from job analysis to test development

My professional orgs

  • IPAC
  • IPMA-HR
  • SIOP
  • PTC-NC