skip to main | skip to sidebar

HR Tests - Recruitment, assessment, and personnel selection

The science and practice of matching employer needs with individual talent.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Research update


Here are a few research articles you may have missed. Just links this time because...well, I'm really enjoying World Cup.

McGrath, et al.: Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
(May Psych. Bulletin)

Hulleman, et al.: A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? (May Psych Bulletin)

Thornton & Potemra: Utility of assessment center for promotion of police sergeants. (March Public Personnel Management)

Bright: Why age matters in the work preferences of public employees: A comparison of three age-related explanations (March Public Personnel Management)

Thomas, et al.: Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs (June JOOP)

Bjørkelo, et al.: Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour (June JOOP)

Zibarras & Woods: A survey of UK selection practices across different organization sizes and industry sectors (June JOOP)

Posted by BryanB at 6/13/2010

Labels: Age differences, Assessment centers, Meta-analysis, Personality testing, Public safety, Statistics

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

HCI 50 Best Blogs - HR 2011

Recent Comments

Get posts via e-mail

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Feed for posts

Feed for comments


My shared items

Feed for shared items

Subscribe in a reader

Get shared items via email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Terms of service

While I do not have a duty to modify or withdraw posts/comments, I may do so if I choose.
FeedBurner privacy statement

Search this blog

Search Relevant Sites

Labels

  • Adverse impact (39)
  • Advertising (25)
  • Affirmative action (7)
  • Age differences (10)
  • applicant reactions (1)
  • Appraisal (1)
  • Articles (58)
  • Assessment centers (23)
  • ATS (12)
  • Attraction (4)
  • Background checks (14)
  • Benchmarks (1)
  • Best practices (142)
  • Biodata (10)
  • Blogs (16)
  • Books (11)
  • Branding (8)
  • Careers (1)
  • Cognitive ability (38)
  • Compensation (2)
  • Competencies (7)
  • Computer adaptive testing (1)
  • Conferences (30)
  • Creativity (1)
  • credit scores (1)
  • Criteria (1)
  • CSE (1)
  • Cultural differences (3)
  • Cutoff scores (5)
  • CWB (8)
  • Decision-making (1)
  • Disabilities (5)
  • Discrimination (69)
  • Disparate treament (1)
  • Education (3)
  • EEO (4)
  • Emotional intelligence (1)
  • Engagement (4)
  • Executive selection (1)
  • Experience (2)
  • Faking (8)
  • Firefighters (1)
  • Games (2)
  • Gender differences (11)
  • Guest articles (1)
  • Honesty/Integrity (4)
  • HRM (5)
  • HRO (1)
  • http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifRace differences (1)
  • Humorous (19)
  • IM (2)
  • Innovation (33)
  • Interests (2)
  • Internet-based testing (13)
  • Interviews (40)
  • Job analysis (15)
  • Job search (1)
  • leadership (17)
  • Legal (97)
  • Meta-analysis (25)
  • Metrics (2)
  • Military (1)
  • MQs (1)
  • Multiple-choice (1)
  • OCB (6)
  • OFCCP (2)
  • Online testing (4)
  • Org culture (1)
  • P-O fit (16)
  • Perceptions (14)
  • Performance ratings (1)
  • Personality testing (101)
  • Physical ability testing (4)
  • Police (1)
  • Political skill (1)
  • Practice effects (1)
  • Predictions (1)
  • Presentations (25)
  • Procedural justice (5)
  • Professional orgs (28)
  • Public safety (11)
  • Public sector (1)
  • Q and A (4)
  • Race differences (12)
  • Recruiting (55)
  • Reference checks (13)
  • Research (152)
  • Resumes (3)
  • Retention (14)
  • Retesting (1)
  • RJP (8)
  • Search engines (1)
  • Security (1)
  • Simulation (1)
  • Simulations (7)
  • Situational judgment tehttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifsts (1)
  • Situational judgment tests (21)
  • Social networking (17)
  • Software (3)
  • Statistics (36)
  • Stress (2)
  • Surveys (16)
  • T and E (17)
  • Talent War (9)
  • Teams (7)
  • Technology (22)
  • Tests (13)
  • Training (19)
  • Turnover (4)
  • Utility (8)
  • Validity (24)
  • Video (23)
  • Web tools (99)
  • Wiki (3)
  • Work samples (7)
  • Workforce planning (5)
  • Written m-c (5)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (10)
    • ►  May (2)
      • May mega research update
      • What The Avengers can teach us about high-performa...
    • ►  April (2)
      • A fascinating example of an organization making hi...
      • April research update
    • ►  March (4)
      • Facebook fallout continues
      • Epic fail: Employers continue asking applicants fo...
      • Has your organization given up on rigorous assessm...
      • Credit scores: Useful for selection, but not for t...
    • ►  February (1)
      • February 2012 research update: Facebook; hope; 3-o...
    • ►  January (1)
      • January 2012 research update
  • ►  2011 (40)
    • ►  December (2)
      • Final research update of 2011
      • Forget leadership assessment centers: Use the fat ...
    • ►  November (3)
      • Bad hires in hindsight
      • Research update #583: Impression management and a ...
      • How important is assessment, really?
    • ►  October (1)
      • Advice to bballstud_23@mail.com: Apply using a dif...
    • ►  September (2)
      • Research update + happy anniversary...to me!
      • One last time: It's all subjective
    • ►  August (2)
      • August Research update
      • How can assessment help in a downturn?
    • ►  July (3)
      • July Research Update
      • Is Google+ what we've been waiting for?
      • Should you hire more women for your teams?
    • ►  June (3)
      • New emotional intelligence meta-analysis: Now with...
      • Mega research update
      • Can an applicant be TOO qualified? And...does it ...
    • ►  May (5)
      • Recipe for losing a lawsuit
      • Shameless plug: The 2011 IPAC conference
      • IJSA v.19 #2: Personality, personality, personalit...
      • Hiring HR professionals: What are we thinking?
      • Tech tools: Brainshark and Greenshot
    • ►  April (3)
      • Research update: Political skill, stereotype threa...
      • Are executive recruiters discriminating against no...
      • A little of this, a little of that
    • ►  March (4)
      • Seeing through the candidates' eyes
      • Evidence-based I/O: Where are we? More importantl...
      • Research roundup: Political skill, emotions, and.....
      • Gild.com: What the future looks like
    • ►  February (6)
      • Spring '11 P-Psych: Leadership, interviews, compet...
      • "Grit": An example of will do
      • March IJSA: So much good stuff
      • Research update: From item context to signaling th...
      • We can make assessments "fun"...should we?
      • New blog: Select Perspectives
    • ►  January (6)
      • Job ads: Choose your words wisely
      • Jan TIP gems: HRO, UIT, SIOP, and VII
      • January, 2011 J.A.P.: Interests, trainability test...
      • Supreme Court upholds NASA background checks
      • Why aren't more supervisors held accountable for t...
      • IPAC Call for Proposals Open
  • ▼  2010 (58)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ▼  June (5)
      • June '10 IOP Part II: "Test bias"
      • June '10 IOP Part I: Emotional Intelligence
      • Research update
      • What we can learn from the baseball draft
      • May '10 J.A.P.
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2009 (65)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2008 (103)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (11)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2007 (182)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2006 (109)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (36)

HR Tests Wiki

  • Click here

Jobs from SimplyHired

Loading...

Best...resources...ever

  • O*NET/DOL Guide
  • OPM Hiring Toolkit
  • Dr. Lievens' publications
  • Dr. Morgeson's research
  • Dr. Aguinis' research
  • IPAC Library
  • Schmidt & Hunter, 1998
  • MSPB Studies
  • CA TV&C

Blogs to watch

  • ERE
  • LawMemo Employment Law
  • OFCCP Blogspot
  • Science of Personality
  • HRLitehouse

The big three references

  • The Uniform Guidelines
  • APA Standards
  • SIOP Principles

Personality tests

  • Hogan Personality Inventory
  • 16PF
  • Personal Characteristics Inventory

Cognitive ability tests

  • Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal
  • Wonderlic Personnel Test

About Me

BryanB
View my complete profile
View Bryan Baldwin's profile on LinkedIn

View my page on I-O Practitioners Network

View my page on RecruitingBlogs.com

My presentations & publications

  • Hiring right
  • The future of selection
  • Using the blogosphere to enhance recruitment, assessment, and retention
  • How to hire (VIDEO)
  • Creating defensible selection procedures
  • Moving from job analysis to test development

My professional orgs

  • IPAC
  • IPMA-HR
  • SIOP
  • PTC-NC